Leonardo ENERGY’s Impact

Assessing the Impact of the Leonardo ENERGY Initiative

Entries Tagged as 'reception analysis'

e-learning – the science

April 3rd, 2008 · No Comments · reception analysis

This excellent book [1] on e-learning summarises the state of knowledge in the field from a scientific perspective. A few highlights (including a few surprises):

  1. The market for professional training is approaching 60 B$ annually in the US. About a third a delivered by technology. Over the past 5 years, e-learning has grown 200% at the expense of classroom learning.
  2. The first media comparison study dates from 1947. A classroom was divided in 3 groups, with one group given a lecture, the second watching a movie and the third reading through a text. Subsequent tests showed no significant difference. Hundreds of media comparisons have been conducted meanwhile, confirming that the medium has no influence. Quality of instruction (and interest of the student) is a much more important factor. (our own Cracow experiment confirms this finding)
  3. The contiguity principle: Integrating text & graphics is much more effective than separating text in captions.
  4. The multimedia principle: using words combined with graphics is much more effective than using words alone.Interestingly, it appears that a sequence of static graphics is more effective than animations. Unless there is a compelling reason, best practice is the use of static sequences rather than animations.
  5. The modality principle: words as audio narration to graphics are more effective than on-screen text. We only have a visual and and auditory channel to process information. Using both channels in parallel increases processing capacity.
  6. The redundancy principle: explaining visuals with words using both audio and text hurts learning. (we’ve all been exasperated at times by presenters reading their slides). Use one or the other.
  7. The coherence principle: adding interesting but loosely related materials hurts the learning process.
  8. The personalisation principle: a conversational style and virtual coaches improves learning.
  9. The segmenting principle: manage complexity by breaking a lesson into parts.

[Read more ?]

[Read more →]

4 type of communications – 4 campaign types

March 20th, 2008 · No Comments · impact, reception analysis, technical communication, tools

Communication can serve 4 purposes:

  1. inform – raise awareness
  2. interpret – raise understanding
  3. convince – support readers to develop an opinion or correct a misunderstanding
  4. behaviour change

Obviously, the ultimate goal is behaviour change, this is largely an outcome beyond our control. Most communication are inputs designed for #1-3, with the ultimate purpose of achieving number 4.

This list may be of interest to think about our marketing communications. In essence, it reiterates the point of an earlier post on measuring impact from a different perspective.

The key question is the level of resources we choose to deploy towards a given objective. This needs to be combined with a benchmarking approach on cost effectiveness and quality of the action. As an impact assessment methodology, I sense there is something fundamentally different, but cannot yet put my finger on it. To be continued.

Blogged with the Flock Browser

[Read more →]

Surveying users

February 28th, 2008 · 5 Comments · evaluation, impact, reception analysis, tools

We need to decide whether we want to survey few users in-depth, on many user groups on a variety of issues in a shallow way.The latter appears more appropriate considering the rich content of LE. In this case, a simple attitudinal measurement instrument is needed. Ref [1] divides groups in 5 categories of receptivity: hostile, neutral, uninterested, uninformed and supportive. Each group requires a different approach:

  • hostile: find areas of agreement, use solid science, phrase proposals in value terms. The goal is to divert negative activism into neutrality.
  • neutral: spell out benefits, focus on the downside of not accepting a proposal, discuss alternatives. Keep it simple. The goal is the convert neutrals into supporters.
  • uninterested. these people are informed, but simply don’t care. Appeal to their self-interest.
  • uninformed: lack information. Establish credibility. Keep it simple. Find an emotional link (stories, anecdotes, case studies, …).
  • supportive: keep them on your side. Recharge them, remind them of the stakes, help them with arguments against opponents.

The criteria of a dream case is a positive answer to 5 questions. However, in the real world, such cases do not even need selling – they fly by themselves. So it’s a matter of approaching the ideal as much as possible:

  1. is the case logical, and consistent with facts and experience?
  2. does it favourably address the interests of people who have to decide?
  3. does it eliminate or neutralise competing alternatives?
  4. does it recognise and deal with politics?
  5. is it endorsed by objective, authoritative 3rd parties?

[1] Harvard Business Essentials, Power, Influence and Persuasion, HBS Publishing 2005

Blogged with Flock

[Read more →]

Content marketing tactics and when to use them

December 7th, 2007 · No Comments · reception analysis

This post from Relevant and Valued gives us a few hints about quite a few issues:

  • Why Leonardo ENERGY receives limited comments
  • Why LE3D develops slowly
  • The interest in EPQU magazine

It also forces us to re-think our value proposition to our users.

Contentmarketingjourney2_5

Above chart distinguishes 7 stages in the user conversion process, and identifies which content carriers and channels to deploy at each stage. We can see a number of clusters:

  • Printed media & e-mail marketing are for the converted, i.e. for the ones who already know us
  • From eBooks to seminars, a number of tactics that can be used at any stage
  • 3 tactics for the early and later stages

The article describes a 6 stage recruitment process, to which it adds evangelism.

Iterative_journey_2

Applied to our initiative, we do quite well on acquisition, but need to have more processes for the later stages. A forum such as LE3D provides quite a few barriers to access, so it clearly addresses the users in the later stages. The fact that the forum is a difficult sell is consistent with the fact that we’re weaker in the later stages.

No doubt we’ll have a web session in the near future on this.

Link
[1] Content marketing tactics and when to use them

[Read more →]

Dissemination, reception, utilization

November 24th, 2007 · 1 Comment · reception analysis, technical communication

A very interesting thesis from Finland on technical communication.

Through it, I found out about a discipline in communication science called ‘reception analysis’ that merits a deeper look. Recent results in reception analysis indicates that the interest of the recipient is the determining factor in effectiveness of communication (and not level of difficulty, channel, graphical design, …). Kind of makes sense.

Another observation is that communication moves from top-down to bottom-up. The current marketing environment allows active user participation.

[Read more →]